Sunday, February 10, 2019
The Concerns of Internet Censorship Essays -- Censoring Internet Right
The Concerns of net income Censorship As a pro profit publisher and avid user of the net, I have vex concerned with laws like the communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) that censor free dustup on the net profit. By approving the CDA, Congress has established a case in point which condones censorship regulations for the Internet similar to those that exist for traditional broadcast media. Treating the Internet like broadcast media is a grave mistake because the Internet is in discriminate some(prenominal) culture medium that has been created.My concerns about Internet censorship prompted me to frame Internet Censorship is Absurd and Unconstitutional. In the essay, I outline why I believe that the Internet should not be illegalize in any way for two reasons. First, any law advocating censorship of the Internet is too broad and unenforceable on this global information medium. Second, Internet censorship is a breach of First Amendment rights for those users residing in the United States. The essay will provide insight into why self regulation is the totally viable solution to the problems that have and will be presented to the Internet.Should it be illegal to publish literature with indecent content on the Internet however perfectly legal to publish that same work in scar? This question has spawned the debate over Internet censorship, which is currently raging in the United States Congress as well as in otherwise political forums around the world. The question as to whether the Internet should be censored will continue to be debated for many years to come. As with any political topic, the debate over Internet censorship has its extremes. Many proponents of Internet censorship want strict control over this new information medium. Proponents of Internet censorship such as Senator Jim Exon (D-NE), co-author of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), are in favor of putting strict laws into steer regulating the Internet in order to protect children Th e Decency Act stands for the exposit that it is impose on _or_ oppress to provide pornography to children on computers just as it is wrong to do it on a street corner or anywhere else (Exon). These proponents suggest creating laws for the Internet similar to those now in place for idiot box and radio. Those strongly opposing Internet regulations, such as the Citizens Internet authorization Coalition (CIEC), assert that the Internet is not li... ...1997) n. pag. Online. Internet. 19 Mar. 1997. Available http//pathfinder.com/sAbDXgQAlb0upRm2/ fourth dimension/daily/1997/970319/970319-1.html. Time magazine report on the Supreme Court conjure up of the CDA case. crystallise Nanny Software International. Untitled. n. pag. Online. Internet. 3 Jun. 1997. Available http//www.netnanny.com/. Home page for the Net Nanny Software company which describes the softwares conclude and appropriate usage. Plummer, James C. Decent Information? Consumers Research Magazine Aug. 1996 33. An edito rial on the CDA questioning its premise. Recreational Software Advisory Council Web Site. Online. Internet. 3 Jun. 1997. Available http//www.rsac.org/. Web site for the RSACi rating system which explains the systems purpose and appropriate usage. Sirico, Robert A. Dont Censor the Internet. Forbes 29 July 1996 48. Editorial outlining concerns about governmental control of the Internet and alternatives. Whitmer, Clair. Man Gets 5 Years for Online Child Porn. CNet, Inc. (23 Feb. 1996) n. pag. Online. Internet. http//www.news.com/ intelligence operation/Item/0,4,787,00.html. Report of a man sentenced for sending child pornography via the Internet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment