Comparing Housman's and Updike's poems that have two totally different attitudes toward athletes.

In A.E. Housmans poesy To an Athletes Dying Young and flush toilet Updikes poem Ex- hoops Player, each of the speakers use two different types of attitudes toward the athletes. In A.E. Housmans poem, his sort of thinking about the athlete is negative. Smart lad, to fall away betimes away From field where glory does non stay And archaeozoic though the laurel grows It shrivel quicker than the rose. (955) The author expresses that the finis of this young athlete fleck he was famous was fail than growing old and go through losing it. So set, to begin with its echoes fade, The fleet foot on the sill of shade, And aim to the low cope up The still- defended challenge-cup.(955) To die famous is better than dying(p) a nil which many athletes end up doing. On the early(a) hand John Updikes state of mind toward athletes is sad. He was good: in fact, the best. In 46 He bucketed three hundred ninety points,A county record still. The be loved interchange. (1) The author shows that motion-picture show was so great at one point in his life, so good that Flick neer though of learning new skills because he would not need them to play basketball.

He never learned a trade, he just sells gas, Checks oil, and changes flats. Once in a while, As a gag, he dribbles an inner tube, But most of us remember anyway.(1) Now Flicks life is energy more than long job of doing crap. Basketball was not a career that never ended because it does end once somebody better or young comes along to take a place of an former(a) player. The author revels the haunting truth that you faecal matter not be the best forev er. I! f you want to get a amply essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper