Primary Sourse

Erin Gaudette AP Prep History Block 2 uncomplicated Sources Governor Berkeley Reports, American Spirit, pages 33-34 (A2) LAST QUESTION & ANSWER ONLY (23) A Contract for Indentured Service, American Spirit, pages 62-63 (A1) A Servant Girl Pays the Wages of Sin, American Spirit, page 69 (A4) In the late 1600s Virginia was governed by Sir William Berkeley. In 1671, London asked Berkeley a series of questions including a question about the teachings of Christianity.He responded by saying, our ministers are tumefy paid, and by my consent should be better if they would pray more often and preach less. Governor Berkeley in any case believed that churlren ought to be taught religion by their parents. He said, But, I thank God, there are neither bring out schools nor printing, and I hope we shall non have these hundred historic period. For learning has brought disobedience, and heresy. I dont stop with what Governor Berkeley believed. He contradicted his own beliefs. He talked about how he was against new ways of thinking or new ideas.He wanted everyone to believe in the Christian religion. If Berkeley wanted everyone to stay with traditional ideas, why would he have wanted individual families to teach religion? Wouldnt it be less likely to do clean-handed thinkers if one minister taught the children the religion instead of individual families? Berkeley wants to prevent any miscellanea of heresy, yet he is provoking it. Indentured servants were often lower class people in England who would give-up the ghost for a number of years and would then be set free.In return for their work they would be given free passage to America by their owner. In 1635 a list of requirements were written for the servant and owner to follow. The form included orders for the owner to provide the servant with food, drink, clothing, shelter, free passage to the new world, and after their years of work are over to provide them with corn for a year and 0 acres of land, In my opinion, I think this contract is pretty fair. The contract makes the indentured servants seem like employees for a job. The indentured servants arent organism forced to work they are making the ecision to. Also, in return for their work theyre being repaid by their owners. The contract seems to give both parties a reasonable payment which makes the contract fair. Although I stop with the methods and payments of indentured servants, I dont agree with the punishments whatsoever servants received. I do think some of the servants behaviors should be looked down upon, but I also think the punishment they faced was a atomic number 42 harsh. Charles City County Court in Virginia has a record that shows how harsh the punishments got.Elizabeth Hatcher owned servant Anne Parke. When Anne Parke had a child her years of work were doubled. Every indentured servant and their owner had a contract for the amount of years they worked. Therefore, when Anne Parkes contract was doubled, it was violating he r rights. I personally think the system created for indentured servants was fair, but since the agreement was not always followed it wasnt carried out equally. The system could have been successful if both the owners and servants had followed it properly.